@xIamTheReaper (X)

This account is unusually candid: the bio says "Meme trader. Rug dodger." It links out to rugs.fun and solpump.io/a/REAPER — and that /a/REAPER path is an affiliate referral code, meaning the account is paid when someone signs up or trades through it. That is the finding. The content is streaming and meme-coin promotion (one post talks about selling "a horse, a pig, and a rabbit to get stream money", linking to kick.com, solpump.io and rugs.fun), and the economics run on referred volume. The reader takes the risk on a class of token that is designed to fail; the account is paid either way. Seven community reports are matched to this identifier.

Originally published on GACS — Global Anti-Crime & Safety. Verify the latest status of this report at https://gacs.app/scam/xiamthereaper-x-91afc7. Browse the full public scam registry, see live scam alerts, or report a scam. © GACS · Licensed CC BY 4.0 with attribution to gacs.app.

1. 1Build an audience with meme-coin and streaming content.
2. 2Link out to speculative token platforms using a personal affiliate code.
3. 3Earn referral revenue on the volume the audience generates.

• Outbound links to rugs.fun and solpump.io with an affiliate path (/a/REAPER).
• Profile bio references meme trading and rug-pull exposure.
• 7 independent community reports matched to this identifier.

Limits of this evidence: GACS has not found evidence that this account operated a rug pull itself. The documented issue is affiliate-driven promotion of platforms where losses are the normal outcome.

• Outbound links to 'rugs.fun' and 'solpump.io/a/REAPER' which are associated with meme coins, often used for 'pump and dump' or 'rug pull' schemes
• Profile description 'Meme trader. Rug dodger.' openly references involvement in highly risky, speculative, and often scam-prone meme coin trading
• Post mentioning 'sell a horse, a pig, and a rabbit to get stream money' leading to links for kick.com, solpump.io, and rugs.fun, likely an attempt to drive traffic and engagement to these high-risk platforms for personal gain

• Posts about 'stack wins' and 'buybacks on that scale definitely change the supply dynamics 👀🔥 Strong short-term support, but price still follows demand too 📊' promoting speculative trading
• General advice like 'High upside, but even higher risk ⚠️ Memecoins can move fast both ways 👀' while engaging in promotion of these assets, which could be seen as a disclaimer for risky behavior they are still encouraging
• Low organic engagement on some posts (e.g., 'Likes: 0 | Retweets: 0') despite a verified status and 3k+ followers, which can sometimes indicate non-organic activity although not definitively

1. 6/7/2026High risk · risk 60/100

   Handle is one character away from a known blacklisted scam: @xIamTheReaper (X). Typo-squatting is the #1 impersonation tactic — double-check the spelling matches the real account

The operator registers a handle that wraps a real brand name in an extra word — support, giveaway, recovery, airdrop, official — so it looks like a department of the company. Victims searching for help find the fake account before the real one, and the conversation moves straight to direct messages where there is no moderation and no record.

• The genuine account never bolts words like "official", "support" or "airdrop" onto its handle
• Account is far younger than the brand it claims to represent
• First move is always to take you into a private chat
• Asks for a seed phrase, a screen-share, or a "verification" transfer

• FTC — Reporting crypto scams and impersonation
• FBI IC3 — Public service announcements on impersonation fraud

Sources and method

• CFTC — Customer advisories

  Advisories on speculative token promotion and referral incentives.

• GACS social scanner

  Our scanner reads the public profile and recent posts, scores the behavioural signals, and re-checks the account on a schedule so a listing reflects current behaviour, not a single moment.

• Primary observation

  The page or profile this listing was created from.

• 7 community reports

  Independent submissions from people who ran into this. Reports are matched on the identifier, not the name, so renaming does not reset the count.

First observed 6/7/2026, re-checked 1 time since. Each re-check re-reads the live profile or page rather than trusting the earlier verdict. This listing has also been reviewed by hand: the narrative above was written from the observed evidence, not generated. If you believe this listing is wrong, you can appeal it and we will re-check the evidence.