@cryptoxxxcoffee (X)

This account industrialises the giveaway scam. It posts, several times a day, offers of specific large sums — $56,000, $44,000, $35,000, $14,000, $10,000 — released to anyone who replies with "$XRP", "$USDT" or simply "Yes", styling itself an "X Queen" rewarding followers. The arithmetic is the giveaway. No individual funds six-figure daily payouts to strangers with no sponsor, no company and no published terms. The repetition is deliberate: each post harvests a fresh batch of replies, and the reply list is then worked privately, where the ask arrives — a fee to "process" the transfer, or a wallet connection to "receive" it. With 265 community reports matched to this identifier, this is one of the most-reported single accounts in the registry.

Originally published on GACS — Global Anti-Crime & Safety. Verify the latest status of this report at https://gacs.app/scam/cryptoxxxcoffee-x-46b539. Browse the full public scam registry, see live scam alerts, or report a scam. © GACS · Licensed CC BY 4.0 with attribution to gacs.app.

1. 1A dollar figure is announced with a trivial entry condition (reply, like, repost).
2. 2Repeat several times a day so a rolling list of hopeful repliers builds up.
3. 3Move the winners privately into direct messages or Telegram.
4. 4Ask for a processing fee, a Binance UID, or a wallet connection.

• Repetitive high-value giveaway posts with no sponsor, terms or funding source.
• Handle uses high-risk giveaway keywords.
• 265 independent community reports matched to this identifier.

Limits of this evidence: The dollar amounts quoted are the amounts the account claims to give away. GACS has not verified that any payment was ever made to anyone.

• Giveaway scam: repetitive posts offering large sums of money ($56,000, $35,000, $10,000, $44,000, $14,000) for simple actions like saying '$XRP', '$USDT', or 'Yes'
• Fake celebrity/giveaway: the profile poses as an 'X Queen' promising unrealistic giveaways to followers
• Unrealistic promises: giving away tens of thousands of dollars multiple times a day is not financially viable or credible for an individual account

• Handle uses high-risk crypto/trading keywords commonly seen in scam accounts
• High bot likelihood: the repetitive nature of posts and identical giveaway mechanics across several posts suggest automation
• Low organic engagement relative to follower count: despite having 174,067 followers, post likes and retweets are in the tens to hundreds, which is very low for such a large audience, especially for posts promising money. This suggests inflated follower count or low active engagement

1. 6/12/2026Caution · risk 40/100

   Handle is one character away from a known blacklisted scam: @cryptoxxxcoffee (X). Typo-squatting is the #1 impersonation tactic — double-check the spelling matches the real account

A post promises free tokens, a prize draw, or that any crypto you send will come back multiplied. Entry requires reposting and dropping your wallet address in the replies. The address harvest is the real product: it feeds later dusting, phishing and targeted approaches, and anyone who actually sends funds never sees them again.

• "Send X, get 2X back" — no legitimate exchange has ever run this
• Asks you to post your wallet address publicly
• A countdown or a "only 5 winners" scarcity hook
• Replies are filled with fake winners posting thanks

• FTC — Cryptocurrency giveaway and celebrity-impersonation scams
• FBI IC3 — Cryptocurrency fraud reporting

Sources and method

• SEC Investor.gov — Social media and investment fraud

  Regulator guidance on why social-media giveaway offers are fraud.

• FTC — What to know about cryptocurrency and scams

  No legitimate giveaway requires you to send money first.

• GACS social scanner

  Our scanner reads the public profile and recent posts, scores the behavioural signals, and re-checks the account on a schedule so a listing reflects current behaviour, not a single moment.

• Primary observation

  The page or profile this listing was created from.

• 265 community reports

  Independent submissions from people who ran into this. Reports are matched on the identifier, not the name, so renaming does not reset the count.

First observed 6/7/2026, re-checked 1 time since. Each re-check re-reads the live profile or page rather than trusting the earlier verdict. This listing has also been reviewed by hand: the narrative above was written from the observed evidence, not generated. If you believe this listing is wrong, you can appeal it and we will re-check the evidence.