Real names · real accountability
The GACS team
YMYL safety information needs a real human standing behind it. Here's who's building GACS, why we do it, and how to reach us.
Editorial review
Guides, scam explainers and academy material carry a named reviewer. Reviewers check the facts, the cited sources and the safety advice before a page is published or re-dated.
- Nicholas Alexander — RSE, SO, PMP · Fraud investigations reviewer
- GACS Research Team — standing analyst group that verifies reports, on-chain evidence and registry entries.
Spotted something wrong? Corrections and appeals are handled under our editorial policy.
Contributors & volunteers
GACS verification work is supported by an open community of researchers, victims, on-chain analysts, and security engineers who file reports and confirm scam patterns. Want to help? Email team@gacs.app with your background.
Contact
- General: team@gacs.app
- Security disclosures: security@gacs.app · see /security
- Press & data partnerships: data@gacs.app
- Takedowns, corrections, appeals: see /editorial-policy
How we work
Every entity on the blacklist passes through the verification methodology (3+ independent reports + on-chain or registrar evidence). GACS is advisory-only — we never take payments, never execute trades, and never ask for seed phrases. Follow updates on X
Authoritative sources
Independent primary sources used to check and corroborate the guidance on this page.
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)
Official US channel for reporting internet-enabled fraud and cybercrime.
- US Federal Trade Commission — ReportFraud
Consumer fraud reporting and published enforcement data.
- UK Action Fraud
UK national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime.
- Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre
Canada's central repository for fraud reports and scam alerts.
